The situation in opposition to a gentleman accused of murdering punk rock enthusiast Nicholas Sofer-Schreiber is “a college of crimson herrings” and “stinking kippers by the dozen”, his law firm has advised a court.
Christopher Navin, 29, has admitted stabbing Mr Sofer-Schreiber to demise, but has pleaded not guilty to murder by cause of psychological impairment in the ACT Supreme Court.
A lot of the trial, which has operate for three months so much, has been devoted to evidence about Navin’s psychological well being and regardless of whether he was suffering psychosis at the time of the killing.
The crown outlined a circumstance suggesting Navin was motivated by animosity, soon after he blamed the sufferer for isolating him from friends in the punk rock scene.
The pair experienced fallen out when they shared a home, with the sufferer having lawful motion against Navin, partly in excess of hurt to Mr Sofer-Schreiber’s garage.
The scenario was resolved and pals mentioned Navin laughed it off.
Prosecutors also thorough forensic evidence about blood designs, suggesting the sufferer was not initial stabbed at the entrance door, where Navin said the assault commenced, but at his dining table.
The court docket listened to Navin tried to protect up the criminal offense by burning the knives and other proof, and that he lied to the police.
Yet another important piece of proof was repeated phone phone calls and text messages Navin produced to the victim shortly prior to the killing, to which Mr Sofer-Schreiber did not responded, even with the pair agreeing to satisfy up for lunch.
Prosecutor Margaret Jones informed the jury numerous of Navin’s actions afterward suggested he understood what he did was mistaken.
“He goes to the funeral, and you may discover that was to give a veneer of innocence,” she stated.
It was clear proof of someone being dictated to by psychosis.
She also informed the court docket he gave various accounts to the psychiatrists.
Navin’s possess account recommended the choice to eliminate the sufferer solidified when he remaining his mother and father on Boxing Day.
For months he stated he experienced it in his mind that the voices in his head ended up in league with Mr Sofer-Schreiber and he ought to make friends with him, as he feared he was a risk to his family.
By the time of the killing, he considered the victim was organizing to employ a strike man to destroy members of his family.
Navin said he saw warning symptoms, including when he went to feed a friend’s cats and observed a book with the words “on the loose”.
He said he took that to suggest there was a strike guy on the unfastened.
Then at his parents’ house, he observed a piece of wire in the shape of a noose on a bench and saw his mother go a necklace in a fashion that made him think she was in immediate risk.
Landmarks for psychosis did not change: Littlemore
The prosecution pointed to differences in the narrative told to a number of psychiatrists who taken care of and interviewed Navin, some a lot more than a 12 months later, as proof he was not telling the fact.
But defence barrister Stuart Littlemore described it as “a circumstance concept that is irresponsible and mindlessly prejudiced”.
He mentioned it would be unusual if the tales ended up just the identical.
“But the landmarks along the highway for the psychosis did not alter,” he explained.
Mr Littlemore said it basically was not accurate that Navin was socially isolated, and mentioned he experienced speak to with friends and family members.
He stated his steps could be defined in the context of his mental sickness.
“It was obvious evidence of somebody being dictated to by psychosis,” he stated.
Mr Littlemore instructed the jury there was 1 problem to determine: “The only actual concern is how psychotic he was on Boxing Day two several years in the past, when he knocked on the door of the Lyneham home.”
The situation is continuing.
Subject areas: murder-and-manslaughter, crime, law-crime-and-justice, lyneham-2602, act, australia, canberra-2600